Think our products are only utilized by people in offices keeping an eye the clock? Think again. They’re used by people learning to fly, piloting commercial and military aircraft, keeping the country safe, and saving lives.
Read More
Customers tell us their key requirements when choosing a resource scheduling system for their business so we can tell you what to ask for when selecting a resource schedule or timesheet system for your business.
Recent media reports suggest pushback by small businesses against a new federal law making millions of Americans eligible for overtime pay. This transition need not be so difficult for small businesses. What they do need to make this a success, however, is a time tracking system that benefits both employers and staff.
Logging business expenses can be laborious and complicated. It doesn’t have to be that way. If you are collecting pieces of paper, spending time logging costs, or wasting minutes and hours remembering names and dates, you should read on.
There are many variables when it comes to valuing time. Do you value time by hour, by day, or some other value? Do you value that time by employee, by project, by employee on each project, by customer, by date or some combination? To value time accurately, you need cost and charge rates that match the way your organization values time.
By linking your personal schedule with your organization’s calendar, a scheduler can clearly see a schedule clash and won’t book conflicting time with a customer. Everybody wins.
“We were looking for a time recording package that would enable a transparent link into our accounting system.”
“I 100-percent recommend Timewatch services to other organizations looking for a seamless way to manage staff and facilities.” – CSIO’s Andrew Moss.
Timewatch was the perfect product to meet its needs – completing timesheets, claiming expenses, generating management reports.
“All the other applications we looked at were missing something and did not quite suit our specific needs. In contrast we found that if time® did not have exactly what we needed we could find a work around.”